The individual promoting a Kim Porter biography, purportedly based on her personal diary, is now embroiled in a contentious legal dispute with Diddy and Kim’s sons. In an aggressive stance, he has dismissed the concerns of the young men, seemingly disregarding their emotional ties and the implications of his actions.

Courtney Burgess, alongside his attorney Ariel Mitchell, has issued a sharp rebuttal to Christian and Quincy Combs, the sons of Diddy. This response came after the brothers served a cease-and-desist order, addressing concerns about the alleged tell-all book related to Kim Porter, which they claim undermines their mother’s legacy.

In their legal response, which was obtained by TMZ, Burgess and Mitchell challenged the claims made by Christian and Quincy, asserting that he is not exploiting Kim’s legacy for profit through the book titled “Kim Porter: Tell It All.” They argue that Kim was not primarily known as an actress or entertainer; rather, her notoriety stemmed from her long-standing relationship with Diddy, which complicates the narrative surrounding her life and contributions.

Despite the controversy surrounding the book, Burgess maintains that he possesses the legal copyright to its content. He asserts that Kim granted him these rights prior to her untimely death, which he believes legitimizes his publication of the biography and defends against claims that he is acting unethically.

As previously reported, the Combs brothers contend that they became the rightful heirs and owners of Kim’s intellectual property rights following her passing in November 2018. They assert that this gives them ownership over her purported diary entries, adding a layer of complexity to the ongoing dispute regarding her legacy and the rights to her narrative.

However, Mitchell informed TMZ that Kim and Burgess shared a mutual friend who was a music producer during their earlier years. This connection led to their meeting, during which Kim expressed her intention to provide Burgess with a copy of her diary or memoir before officially sending it to him. This conversation is crucial in establishing the basis for Burgess’s claim to the rights.

Recently, we had the opportunity to speak with Burgess and Mitchell in New York City. They revealed that they had just concluded a session with a federal grand jury and were preparing to meet with federal prosecutors regarding the ongoing Diddy case. Their legal strategy appears to be taking shape as they navigate this high-profile situation.

Reports indicate that federal authorities have seized Burgess’s phone, which reportedly contained vital information related to the flash drive data used in preparing the Porter book. This development raises further questions about the integrity of the material and the unfolding legal battle.

Kim and Diddy’s sons have also approached Burgess, requesting a detailed accounting of any profits he has generated from the book. Burgess has characterized their cease-and-desist notice as a “desperate ploy” orchestrated by Diddy to extract money from him. He argues that this “pathetic attempt” underscores the dire financial circumstances faced by Diddy and his sons, further complicating the emotional and legal landscape surrounding this dispute.