
Exploring Threads’ Response to the Rapid Growth of Bluesky
In the current digital landscape, the question arises: Is Threads genuinely worried about the burgeoning popularity of Bluesky? The answer might be nuanced, depending on how we interpret “concerned” in this scenario.
To provide context, Bluesky, initially an internal project by Twitter, was developed by former Twitter employees and has surged from 9 million users in September to an impressive 20 million today. This notable growth reflects a significant uptick in user interest and engagement.
Despite this leap, Bluesky still trails far behind Threads, which boasts 275 million active users. While the competition is heating up, Threads remains comfortably ahead in terms of its user base. However, both platforms are dwarfed by X, which reported a staggering 570 million monthly active users back in July.
Nonetheless, it appears that Threads is taking the rise of Bluesky seriously. This is evident from the recent rollout of a series of updates that closely resemble features found on Bluesky. Furthermore, Adam Mosseri, the head of Instagram and Threads, has publicly acknowledged Bluesky’s growth, indicating a level of attention that aligns with the competitive landscape.
While Mosseri’s statements may not provide deep insights, the mere fact that he has chosen to comment is telling, especially given Meta’s traditional reluctance to engage with media speculation. This suggests that Threads is indeed keeping a close eye on Bluesky’s developments.
The indicators imply that Threads is concerned about Bluesky’s growing momentum and its potential impact on user engagement and market share. As the digital landscape evolves, the ability to adapt and respond to emerging trends is crucial for maintaining relevance.
Consider the case of Clubhouse, which experienced a meteoric rise from 600,000 users to 2 million in just four weeks, becoming the app of the moment in 2021. Within three months, it soared to 10 million users. While Bluesky may not currently be a direct threat to Threads, the risk lies in influential users migrating to Bluesky and promoting its features, potentially leading to a rapid increase in its user base from 20 million to 100 million.
This shift in user behavior could siphon off a substantial number of potential Threads users, posing a challenge that Meta is keenly aware of.
Meta’s initial vision for Threads was to capture the audience leaving Twitter/X, especially those disillusioned with the changes implemented by Elon Musk. During Threads’ launch, Mosseri expressed his concern about missing the opportunity to attract users seeking alternatives.
He noted, “We wanted to get more done [before launching Threads], but we’re starting to worry that the window of opportunity was closing on us.” This sentiment underscores the urgency Meta felt in establishing Threads as a viable alternative for users seeking refuge from a platform they felt alienated from.
That window represented the market gap created as users turned away from X in search of new platforms. Although Mastodon gained early traction, Bluesky was also drawing attention. Meta’s goal was clear: position Threads as the definitive choice for those seeking alternatives and capture as many users from Twitter as possible.
With Bluesky now gaining traction, it is beginning to dilute Threads’ potential market share. Moreover, the interest shown by tech journalists and influencers in Bluesky poses a risk, as their endorsements could attract a wider audience and influence user behavior.
The situation is further complicated by the fact that even celebrities are now promoting their Bluesky handles, potentially catalyzing an influx of new users and increasing the platform’s visibility.
While Bluesky may not yet be a direct competitor, its growing momentum is a cause for concern for Threads. This could explain the accelerated pace of updates from Threads, reflecting a heightened awareness of the competitive landscape.
Despite these challenges, Threads maintains its position as the leading alternative to X. It is also noteworthy that Threads has experienced an uptick in users since the U.S. election, a period during which Bluesky garnered increased attention. However, based on current trends, Bluesky has the potential to rapidly evolve into a user base of 100 million or even 200 million, prompting Threads to adapt its strategy accordingly.
This strategic response is a testament to Meta’s long-standing practice of innovation through replication to fend off competitors. In summary, while Threads may be somewhat concerned about the rise of Bluesky, it still has a considerable lead, although the situation is dynamic and warrants ongoing attention in the fast-paced world of real-time social media.