Justin Baldoni‘s attorney is vigorously responding to Blake Lively‘s recent motion aimed at distancing herself from the turbulent legal proceedings tied to the film “It Ends with Us.” This legal conflict has escalated, drawing significant public attention and media coverage, as both parties engage in a fierce battle to assert their claims and defend their reputations.

Bryan Freedman, representing Baldoni, expressed his outrage to TMZ, stating, “Ms. Lively’s recent attempt to extricate herself from the chaotic situation she has created is one of the most blatant instances of exploiting our legal system for personal gain.” This statement underscores the serious allegations of impropriety and misuse of legal resources that have emerged from this high-profile case.

Freedman emphasized the importance of adhering to the established legal frameworks, stating, “Stringent rules are put in place to protect the innocent and allow individuals to rightfully defend themselves.” He further noted that “laws are not intended to be manipulated by privileged individuals to serve their own personal agendas,” highlighting the ethical considerations at stake in the ongoing dispute.

Earlier today, TMZ reported that Blake Lively filed a motion aimed at dismissing herself from the legal battle, alleging that Baldoni violated legal protocols by initiating his own lawsuit in a retaliatory manner. This latest development adds another layer of complexity to an already tumultuous situation as both parties navigate the intricacies of the legal system.

In her legal filings, Blake asserts that Baldoni initiated a defamation lawsuit against her, her husband Ryan Reynolds, and her publicist, Leslie Sloane, immediately following her own lawsuit against him. In her claim, Blake accuses Justin of sexual harassment and conducting a smear campaign during the production of the film. Notably, Baldoni served as both the director and Blake’s co-star, further complicating the dynamics of this dispute.

As previously reported, Reynolds was the first to file a motion to be dismissed from Baldoni’s lawsuit, arguing that Baldoni labeled him a “predator.” Reynolds contends that this characterization does not amount to defamation, as he believes the assertion to be true, thus shifting the burden of proof back onto Baldoni to substantiate his claims.

In a recent statement to TMZ, Freedman reiterated his position, asserting, “As we indicated previously in response to Mr. Reynolds’ cowardly actions, we will persist in holding Ms. Lively accountable for her malicious conduct, which includes making unfounded accusations of harassment and retaliation against my clients.” This firm stance highlights the ongoing tensions and the seriousness of the allegations involved in this case.

Freedman further summarized the situation by asserting that Blake’s “fantastical claims will be swiftly debunked as discovery progresses, and they can be easily disproven with concrete evidentiary support.” This statement underscores the confidence of Baldoni’s legal team in their ability to dismantle the allegations made against them.