Elon Musk’s X has launched its first transparency report since renaming from Twitter, which outlines all the reported rule violations, content material removing requests, and different enforcement actions that it actioned over the primary half of this 12 months.
And given X’s up to date strategy to content material moderation, many have been combing via the info attempting to see how Musk’s extra relaxed strategy to moderation has impacted the person expertise. However by way of whole actions, it’s truly fairly related, at the least primarily based on the newest comparative updates from Twitter.
First off, X has offered an outline of the entire enforcement actions that it took primarily based on detected rule violations between January to June 2024.

As you possibly can see on this itemizing, hateful content material, abuse and harassment, and violent content material had been the primary causes for removals, as they’ve historically been in X/Twitter’s studies.
In whole, X studies that it suspended 5.2 million accounts within the first half of this 12 months primarily based on rule violations, and eliminated 10.7 million posts as a result of similar.
Which is greater than what Twitter reported in its final printed transparency report, which coated the primary half of 2022.
Again then, Twitter’s workforce (pre-Elon) enforced the removing of 6.6 million posts, and took motion in opposition to 5 million accounts, although Twitter did word that it suspended solely 1.6 million accounts for violations, which is lots fewer than what X has undertaken not too long ago.
Within the first half of 2021, Twitter reported that it had eliminated 5.9 million tweets, and took motion in opposition to 4.8 million accounts. It suspended 1.2 million of these profiles.
So on stability, X is eradicating much more content material, and suspending extra accounts, regardless of its new, extra open moderation insurance policies.
That’s doubtless reflective of a broader reliance on automation, because of fewer workers, which now sees X taking a extra binary view of violations. So accounts that will as soon as have been requested to take away content material are actually being suspended extra readily.
With that in thoughts, the accounts actioned and suspensions are literally very shut, with X eradicating virtually double as a lot content material as Twitter had been for violations.
Which might be not the end result that many anticipated.
Although the specifics listed below are extra in keeping with broader considerations.
In line with X’s knowledge, customers reported 81 million incidents of abuse and harassment within the interval, and 66 million circumstances of hate speech. Of these, 1.35% of the abusing accounts (per person studies) had been suspended, and 0.004% of these posting hate speech had been eliminated. Tens of millions of hate speech posts had been eliminated, however X is now far much less prone to droop customers for such.
In 2022, 111k profiles had been suspended for hateful conduct, versus 2.3k on this report.
When it comes to will increase, X suspended over 2 million extra accounts for youngster security than it did in 2022, and round 400k extra “misleading entities.”
It’s, nevertheless, taking much less motion in opposition to suicide and self hurt content material (2k suspensions versus 11k in 2022).
When it comes to authorized requests, X acquired 72,000 authorized motion requests within the first half of the 12 months, and complied with 70% of them

In 2022, Twitter acquired 53,000 authorized requests, whereas it acquired 43,387 authorized calls for in 2021. It had beforehand complied with round 54% of those requests.
So, total, regardless of Elon Musk’s claims of a extra open and “free speech” aligned community, X is definitely eradicating extra content material, suspending extra customers, and actioning extra authorized requests than Twitter had been. But, its insurance policies now enable these selling hate speech to stay energetic, whereas self-harm content material can also be seemingly not being enforced as harshly.
None of that is overly shocking. X has clearly said that it’s now relying extra on attain restrictions than account suspensions and content material removals, whereas Elon himself has made an enormous present of opposing sure authorities orders, whereas complying with others.
The entire knowledge right here aligns with this, however on the similar time, X is eradicating extra content material, and suspending extra accounts total, beneath this strategy.
Is that a greater scenario for the app? I imply, advertisers clearly don’t suppose so, however I’d additionally query whether or not it is a extra “free speech” pleasant strategy than what earlier Twitter administration had enforced.
It does appear that Twitter workers had truly been much less prone to droop accounts total, primarily based on the numbers, which meant extra alternative for rectification, versus binary bans.
Or perhaps, X is simply attracting extra posts that invite suspension beneath X’s areas of focus.
It does seem to be a extra dangerous technique, total, however it’s fascinating to notice the comparative variance in X’s moderation technique.
You possibly can take a look at X’s newest transparency report right here.