Brandon Fletcher
What is Grammarly’s Expert Review Feature?
Grammarly is a technology tool because it offers AI-driven text editing features that enhance writing quality, which matters for writers seeking to improve their work.
At SocialSchmuck, we specialize in social media, entertainment, and technology news, helping content creators achieve greater visibility and engagement.
Our platform monetizes through advertising and affiliate partnerships, providing users with valuable insights and updates in the rapidly evolving tech landscape.
This guide covers key aspects of Grammarly’s recent controversy, including:
- The Expert Review feature’s implications
- Details of the class-action lawsuit
- Legal context surrounding the issue
- Expert opinions on the feature
- Company responses and future actions
What Happened with Grammarly’s Expert Review Feature?
Last week, Wired’s Miles Klee reported on Grammarly’s AI text editing feature, called “Expert Review.” This feature used the names of notable figures, including journalists, to provide revision advice for writers. However, these individuals were not consulted about their inclusion.
On Wednesday, Grammarly pulled the Expert Review feature. On the same day, a class-action lawsuit was filed against Grammarly, alleging that the feature misappropriated the identities of the figures it claimed to inspire.
The lawsuit currently has one named member, investigative journalist Julia Angwin. It also references notable figures such as Stephen King. The suit challenges Grammarly’s alleged misappropriation of identities to profit from their names.
What Legal Issues Are Involved?
The lawsuit cites California Civil Code § 3344(a)(1), which states:
“Any person who knowingly uses another’s name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness, in any manner, on or in products, merchandise, or goods, or for purposes of advertising or selling, or soliciting purchases of, products, merchandise, goods, or services, without that person’s prior consent… shall be liable for any damages sustained by the person or persons injured
Daniel Mercer
