
TMZ.com
Wendy Williams appears to be the same vibrant personality she was a decade ago, demonstrating no signs of disability. This observation comes from Harvey Levin, the Executive Producer at TMZ, who engaged in a 90-minute phone conversation with her. During their discussion, Wendy showcased her sharpness and clarity, raising questions about her current state and the implications of her guardianship. This revelation contradicts the narrative presented by her guardianship’s attorney, suggesting that her health is not as compromised as previously claimed.
Harvey expressed his surprise upon discovering that the individual he conversed with is under a strict guardianship that has significantly limited her personal and financial autonomy. During the call, Wendy exhibited lucidity, articulate speech, and a strong sense of opinion, starkly contrasting the portrayal by her guardianship’s legal representative, who claims she is permanently disabled due to frontal lobe dementia. This discrepancy raises vital questions regarding the accuracy of her current legal status and the motivations behind her guardianship.
Throughout the conversation, Wendy demonstrated a remarkable clarity of thought and decision-making, showing no signs of impaired judgment or hesitation. Notably, Charlamagne Tha God participated in the call and corroborated Harvey’s assessment, affirming that Wendy is far from the disabled image painted by her guardianship. This collective endorsement of her mental acuity challenges the narrative surrounding her health and raises questions about the oversight of her guardianship.
Wendy has faced challenges with substance abuse in her past, yet she appeared to be in a clear state of mind during her conversation with TMZ. This situation prompts a critical inquiry: When the judge assigned Wendy to guardianship, was the decision influenced more by her history with alcohol rather than any genuine medical condition? This line of questioning unveils the complexities surrounding her guardianship and the implications for her autonomy.

We In Miami Podcast
The attorney for the guardianship, Roberta Kaplan, indicated that Wendy experiences varying days of clarity and confusion. Interestingly, it seems that her good days coincide with recent assessments, as she appeared coherent during multiple interviews leading up to the conversation with Harvey. This pattern raises significant questions about the consistency of her reported condition and whether the guardianship is appropriately addressing her needs.

Power 105.1 / The Breakfast Club
Ultimately, the pressing question remains: Is Harvey correct in his belief that Wendy might thrive better as a free individual with the support of a sober coach, rather than being confined to an assisted living facility under stringent guardianship? This inquiry not only challenges the current structure of her guardianship but also invites a broader discussion about personal autonomy and mental health management.