Say farewell to the classic XPS 13, and say hello to the spiffy new XPS 13. Dell shocked us at CES by bringing the modern day (and somewhat controversial) design and style of 2022’s XPS 13 Plus to its complete flagship lineup, which now contains the bigger XPS 14 and 16 models. With this new design and style, they all have invisible haptic trackpads hidden beneath the glass-covered wrist rest, a capacitive leading row of function keys (which can immediately switch to media controls), and wider gap-much less keyboards that have no spacing among keys. But do these upgrades essentially make them improved computer systems than Dell’s prior XPS lineup? Properly, it actually depends on how significantly you like the way they appear.
When I reviewed the XPS 16 final month, I was impressed by its sheer energy and attractiveness, but its higher cost and a couple of quirks created it a tougher sell than the XPS 15 that came prior to it. The identical is largely accurate for the XPS 13 and 14. The smaller sized model is essentially just the XPS 13 Plus with a new Intel Core Ultra 7 chip. The XPS 14 is far extra intriguing, considering that it aims to pack in the energy of the XPS 16 without having getting so damn hefty. I’m reviewing them collectively simply because they are gunning for a pretty related audience: Individuals who demand each speed and portability. Picking among them comes down to how significantly energy you essentially will need and how significantly weight you are prepared to deal with.
Dell
Dell’s most recent XPS 13 is fashionable, transportable and effective. You will have to get utilized to some of its design and style quirks, although, and it is far pricier than older models.
- Appealing and modern day design and style
- Strong efficiency for an ultraportable
- Outstanding keyboard
- Beautiful show
- Invisible trackpad leads to usability troubles
- Function keys disappear in sunlight
- Trackpad feels sluggish at 60Hz
- Could use extra ports
- High-priced
$1,399 at Dell
Dell
Dell’s XPS 14 is a wonderful and effective MacBook Pro competitor, although you will spend for its modern day design and style with usability quirks and a larger general cost.
- Speedy efficiency
- Beautiful OLED screen
- Appealing modern day design and style
- Invisible trackpad leads to usability troubles
- Function keys disappear in sunlight
- High-priced
- Trackpad sluggish at 60Hz
$1,699 at Dell
Just like their bigger sibling, each the XPS 13 and 14 are beautiful to behold. They are workouts in minimalism, with all-aluminum circumstances (out there in light or dark variants) and clean layouts about their keyboards. And yes, their displays also have razor-thin bezels, a thing Dell popularized with the XPS line more than a decade ago. Rather than attempt to stand out with extraneous attributes like dual screens or a plethora of LEDs, the XPS 13 and 14 make extra of a statement by what they do not have: visible trackpads and devoted function keys.
Like the XPS 13 Plus, this year’s XPS 13 only carries two USB-C sockets and no other ports — no devoted headphone jack, not even a devoted charging connection. But hey, at least Dell place its USB-C ports on opposite sides, a thing I’d nonetheless like to see on the MacBook Air. If you want any other extra connectivity, you are in all probability improved off with the XPS 14, which has 3 USB-C ports, a headphone jack and a micro-SD card slot. Specialists would be improved off with a complete-sized SD card reader, although, and it would be good to have an HDMI port like the MacBook Pro 14-inch.
Weight is the most apparent distinction among the XPS 13 and 14: the smaller sized model comes in at two.six pounds (slightly much less than the MacBook Air), although the XPS 14 is noticeably heftier at three.7 pounds. (Dell is following Apple’s item method a bit, as the 13-inch MacBook Air weighs two.7 pounds and the MacBook Pro 14-inch sits among three.four and three.six pounds.) The XPS 13 and 14 are each uncomplicated to carry about all day, but the one particular-pound distinction could make the bigger model extra annoying if you are attempting to travel light.
Nevertheless, the XPS 14 justifies its extra heft by cramming in extra hardware. It can be equipped with NVIDIA’s RTX 4050 GPU (operating at 30 watts), and also attributes extra robust cooling, which makes it possible for it to attain a larger maximum thermal envelope of 47 watts. The XPS 13, on the other hand, can only hit 28 watts of sustained efficiency. Even although each machines use the identical Intel Core Ultra CPUs, you will finish up seeing far improved efficiency from the XPS 14 for prolonged workloads like video encoding or 3D rendering. (Once more, that is significantly like the distinction among the MacBook Air and base configuration MacBook Pro.)
The XPS 14’s 14.five-inch screen is an inch bigger than the XPS 13’s, which tends to make it extra comfy for multitasking with numerous apps or functioning on media timelines. No matter which model you pick out, although, you will get a vibrant and immersive image, along with thin bezels that Apple nonetheless can not touch. Each computer systems give a selection of viewing solutions: the XPS 13 can be equipped with Complete HD+ (1,920 by 1,200 pixels, non-touch), Quad HD+ (two,560 by 1,600) or 3K+ OLED (two,880 by 1,800), although its bigger sibling gets Complete HD+ (non-touch) and three.2K+ OLED (three,200 by two,000) screens..
Dolby Vision is typical across the board, but you will only get one hundred % DCI-P3 colour gamut coverage with the pricier displays. You will also get up to 120Hz refresh prices on all of the screens, except for the XPS 13’s OLED, which maxes out at 60Hz. (I’d propose avoiding that selection totally and going for a higher refresh price LCD, which will eventually provide a smoother image.)
|
None |
PCMark ten |
3DMark (TimeSpy Intense) |
Geekbench six |
Cinebench R23 |
|
Dell XPS 13 (2024, Intel Core Ultra five 135U, Intel Graphics) |
five,772 |
1,075 |
two,276/11,490 |
1,662/ten,298 |
|
Dell XPS 14 (Intel Core Ultra 7 165H, Intel Arc) |
six,737 |
9,107 |
two,261/11,920 |
1,572/11,295 |
|
Dell XPS 16 (Intel Core Ultra 7 155H, NVIDIA RTX 4070) |
7,436 |
four,087 |
two,298/13,117 |
1,676/14,755 |
|
Framework Laptop 16 (AMD Ryzen 7 7840HS, Radeon RX 7700S) |
eight,129 |
four,770 |
two,557/11,961 |
1,675/14,448 |
Each the XPS 13 and XPS 14 I reviewed have been equipped with Intel’s Core Ultra 7 155H CPU, 16GB of RAM and a 512GB SSD. The XPS 14 also had NVIDIA’s RTX 4050 GPU, although the smaller sized laptop relied on Intel’s constructed-in Arc graphics. As I anticipated, they did not differ also significantly when it came to CPU benchmarks like Geekbench six. But the XPS 14 was twice as rapid as the XPS 13 in the Geekbench six Compute test, which relies on the GPU for extra intensive function. That NVIDIA hardware also helped the XPS 14 be extra than 3 occasions as rapid as the 13 in the Geekbench Machine Studying GPU test.
Even though the XPS 14 is far from what I’d get in touch with a gaming laptop, its NVIDIA GPU also let me play Halo Infinite in 1080p with medium graphics at 40fps. That is not specifically my best Halo expertise, but hey, it is playable. In comparison, the XPS 13’s Intel Arc graphics barely managed to sustain 25fps. The RTX 4050 GPU is primarily valuable for media creation on the XPS 14: I was in a position to use Handbrake to transcode a 4K clip into 1080p in 26 seconds, whereas that identical activity took 36 seconds on the XPS 13.
I had no problems with my day-to-day workflow on either machine, but I enjoyed carrying the XPS 13 about town far extra than the XPS 14 just simply because it is lighter and less difficult to maneuver. I could slip it into a tote bag without having a second believed, bring it to Starbucks and get up and operating conveniently. Thanks to its extra bulk and weight, II from time to time had problems stuffing the XPS 14 into the identical bag amid the accoutrements of parenthood. This will not be significantly of a trouble if you are making use of a backpack (and not attempting to match in kids’ toys and snacks), but it was a reminder of how valuable a sub-3 pound notebook can be.
Significantly like the XPS 16, I enjoyed typing on Dell’s lusciously wide keyboards. The huge important caps are uncomplicated to hit and they have a satisfying quantity of important travel. The keyboard is extra visually impressive on the XPS 13, considering that it stretches totally edge-to-edge, although it is flanked by speakers on the XPS 14. The capacitive function keys are fine most of the time, but they nonetheless disappear in direct sunlight and other vibrant lighting.
And then there is the trackpad. By now, I am utilized to Dell’s invisible design and style, and I also appreciated the improved size of the XPS 14’s trackpad. But it nonetheless requires some adjustment, particularly for newcomers. I’ve also noticed that it is from time to time difficult to come across the line that separates left and appropriate clicks, which led to a couple of frustrated attempts to copy and paste hyperlinks from Chrome.
Now that I’ve knowledgeable Dell’s invisible trackpad and capacitive function row across 4 machines, I am even extra convinced they are a error. Certain, they appear cool and assistance Dell stand out in the dull globe of Windows laptops, but that does not justify the usability troubles. On the XPS 13 and 14, I also saw fraction-of-a-second delays although swiping about Windows. The trouble went away when I forced each machines to run at 120Hz, but that also utilizes extra battery life than operating at 60Hz. It virtually feels like I am attempting to swipe by way of an extra layer of glass. I noticed the identical challenge on numerous XPS 13 and 14 units, but Dell tells me it hasn’t been in a position to replicate any slowdown in its labs. The corporation will be undertaking a additional investigation into our critique units, and I will report back later on what it finds.
As for the rest of their hardware, each the XPS 13 and XPS 14 function strong 1080p webcams with Windows Hello help for facial authentication. You can also use Windows Studio Effects in the course of video chats to blur backgrounds and adjust your gaze, thanks to the NPUs in Intel’s new Core Ultra chips. Their eight-watt speaker setups sound fine for watching YouTube videos or playing a bit of background music, but they’re not almost as impressive as Apple’s notebooks. There was also a surprising battery life gap among each machines: The XPS 13 lasted 13 hours and 15 minutes in PCMark 10’s Modern day Workplace benchmark, although the XPS 14 ran for just 4 and a half hours. You can chalk that up to its beefier GPU, as nicely as its bigger screen.
A further downside to the XPS 13 and 14’s spiffy appear? Greater costs. The XPS 13 now begins at $1,399 with the configuration we tested, although the XPS 16 begins at $1,699. (Our critique unit would expense $two,399, thanks to its NVIDIA GPU and OLED screen.) I will give Dell credit for generating 16GB of RAM typical, as an alternative of 8GB like prior models, but for the most element you are paying out the nose to have a prettier trackpad. Is that actually worth it? Dell’s pricing is especially wild when you think about you can nab an M3 MacBook Air for $1,099 and a 14-inch MacBook Pro for $1,599. Certain, you will also will need to add $200 to get 16GB of RAM, but even the base configurations are more quickly than Dell’s laptops.
Even though there’s a lot to like about the new XPS 13 and XPS 14, we can not propose them as conveniently as Dell’s earlier XPS generations. They appear appealing and carry out nicely, but that comes at a expense for usability, battery life and, nicely, actual expense. Just place, you are paying extra for fairly machines.










