Elon Musk is making headlines with his ambitious $97.4 billion proposal to take control of OpenAI. According to The Wall Street Journal, a consortium of investors spearheaded by Musk’s xAI has put forth an unsolicited offer to the board of directors of OpenAI. This group is aiming to acquire the nonprofit organization that oversees OpenAI’s for-profit division, highlighting the intense interest in artificial intelligence and its future direction.
In response to inquiries regarding this significant offer, an OpenAI spokesperson directed Engadget to a post made by CEO Sam Altman on X. Altman humorously countered the offer by stating, “No thank you but we will buy Twitter for $9.74 billion if you want,” showcasing his wit and confidence in the company’s direction while engaging with the social media platform owned by Musk.
no thank you but we will buy twitter for $9.74 billion if you want
— Sam Altman (@sama) February 10, 2025
Musk expressed a strong desire for OpenAI to revert to its original mission as an open-source, safety-focused organization dedicated to benefiting humanity. In a statement shared by his attorney with The Journal, he emphasized, “It’s time for OpenAI to return to the open-source, safety-focused force for good it once was.” This statement underscores Musk’s commitment to the ethical development of artificial intelligence.
The seriousness of Musk’s bid remains uncertain, raising questions about its potential success. OpenAI operates under a unique nonprofit structure, a model that Sam Altman and his team believe is essential for the organization’s mission and integrity. This structure may shield OpenAI from Musk’s aggressive offer, as it deviates from the conventional for-profit corporate model. If OpenAI were entirely for-profit with standard shares, Musk’s proposal could compel the board to consider a sale to maximize profits for shareholders, a situation described in corporate law as a “Revlon moment.”
Musk’s reaction to Altman’s playful remark was notably critical; he responded by labeling Altman a “Swindler” and later referred to him as “Scam Altman.” This exchange highlights the increasing tension and competition between these high-profile tech figures as they navigate the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence.
If you buy something through a link in this article, we may earn a commission.










