Devin Haney Ex’s Request to Share Child on Social Media Denied

Devin Haney achieved a significant legal victory in a Los Angeles court recently. The judge ruled against a motion filed by his ex-fiancée, Leena Sayed, which sought permission to post their one-year-old child on social media without Haney’s consent.

• Haney’s court victory emphasizes the importance of parental consent in social media postings.
• Judge Hank Goldberg supported Haney’s stance on protecting their child’s privacy.

According to court documents, Judge Goldberg affirmed Haney’s desire to maintain their parenting agreement. He stated, “There is no argument as to why a one-year-old child would benefit from being exposed to the public and a subject of social media attention.”

“It is entirely understandable that celebrity parents may desire to shield their children from the public and from social media. Public culture is replete with stories of children of celebrity parents who have been harmed by the public spotlight.”

• Judge Goldberg’s ruling reflects a growing concern for children’s privacy in the digital age.
• Celebrity parents face unique challenges in balancing public life and family privacy.

The ruling clarified that the stipulation does not prohibit all photographs. Parents can share images from events like birthday parties while keeping the child out of frame.

Aspect	Haney’s Position	Sayed’s Position
Child’s Privacy	Protect child’s identity from public exposure	Wants to share child’s images on social media
Legal Representation	Highly competent counsel	Highly competent counsel

The ruling also noted that both parties were represented by competent counsel during the settlement process. There were no allegations of duress or undue influence regarding their agreement.

In conclusion, Judge Goldberg determined that the provision in their parenting agreement serves the child’s best interest and denied Sayed’s motion to modify it.

• Legal agreements regarding children’s images can significantly impact parenting dynamics.
• Judicial decisions reflect societal concerns about children’s exposure to social media.

During the proceedings, Haney’s lawyers argued that Sayed’s career on OnlyFans was a valid reason to restrict her from posting pictures of their child, Khrome, without his approval.

Factor	Haney’s Argument	Sayed’s Argument
OnlyFans Career	Potential negative influence on child	Right to share personal life
Child’s Privacy	Child should remain private	Child is part of family life

Haney’s legal team emphasized that Sayed’s self-objectification and the nature of her content could attract unwanted attention from her followers, which may not be suitable for their child.

We have reached out to both Haney and Sayed’s lawyers for comments regarding this ruling.

Here you can find the original content; the photos and images used in our article also come from this source. We are not their authors; they have been used solely for informational purposes with proper attribution to their original source.