Threads is launching an exciting new feature inspired by Bluesky that allows users to have multiple feeds visible directly on the home screen. This enhancement simplifies the process of navigating between your “Following” feed, the “For You” recommended stream, and any custom lists you’ve created. This change is designed to enhance user experience by providing easier access to diverse content streams, making social media interactions more fluid and enjoyable.

As illustrated in the example shared by IG/Threads chief Adam Mosseri, users will no longer need to tap the Threads icon at the top to reveal alternative feed options. Instead, these feeds will be readily available on the screen, and users can effortlessly swipe between them. This change is aimed at streamlining the user interface and making it more intuitive for users to engage with their preferred content.

This update also means the previous Threads functionality that allowed users to express preferences by swiping left or right on a post will be removed. Users will now have a more straightforward method to engage with content, which may improve overall interaction rates and user satisfaction on the platform.

As per Threads:

“Some of you have asked about swiping on posts. Now, tap the heart to like a post if you want to see more like it. If you want to see less of something, tap the three-dot menu, then “Not interested.”

With this shift, Threads is transitioning back to traditional social media functionalities instead of relying on swipe gestures for user feedback, which may not have been widely adopted. This move is likely to resonate better with users who prefer more familiar interaction methods, ultimately boosting engagement on the platform.

In response to months of feedback for a default Following feed, improved follower growth processes, and enhanced search features, Threads has successfully implemented these changes within just a few weeks. This rapid development reflects the platform’s commitment to addressing user needs and improving overall functionality.

This evolution has been significantly influenced by the emergence of Bluesky, drawing attention to the evolving landscape of decentralized social applications. The competitive pressure from Bluesky has prompted Threads to innovate and enhance its offerings to retain user interest and engagement.

The recent U.S. election served as a pivotal moment, highlighting the inadequacies of Threads’ algorithm-based feeds for staying updated with real-time news. Many users discovered that the platform’s focus on engagement over timeliness led to a lack of relevant information during crucial events, further fueling interest in exploring alternatives like Bluesky.

Journalists and news consumers have noted that building an audience and extending reach for news content is more efficient on Bluesky. This platform’s design encourages users to actively engage and follow accounts, fostering a more vibrant news-sharing environment compared to Threads.

This advantage becomes evident when considering that Bluesky allows users to default to their “Following” feed, motivating them to curate their content streams by following relevant accounts. In contrast, Threads’ algorithmic recommendations can make following less meaningful, as users may rely more on the platform’s automated suggestions rather than actively seeking out content.

Additionally, Bluesky does not suppress links or political content, appealing to writers and publishers who use social media to drive referral traffic. This flexibility makes Bluesky an attractive option for those looking to engage with a broader audience while sharing diverse content.

This stark difference in approach highlights why Meta’s entertainment-focused, non-political, algorithm-based strategy, which has proven successful on platforms like Facebook and Instagram, may not be as effective on Threads. Users are seeking a platform that prioritizes real-time engagement and diverse content sharing.

When considering the dynamics of building a viable alternative to Twitter, it’s crucial to acknowledge that a significant portion of Twitter’s user base primarily consumed content rather than actively posting. Research indicates that around 80% of Twitter users, on average, never posted, liked, commented, or engaged in the app in any way. They simply used the platform to stay informed about the latest news and updates in their areas of interest.

Twitter excelled at delivering up-to-the-minute updates on various topics, including sports, politics, business, and entertainment. Influential voices would share their insights, drawing dedicated followers who tuned in for their thoughts and updates. These interactions often transcended Twitter, with content shared across other platforms, solidifying Twitter’s significant influence despite its smaller audience compared to Facebook or Instagram.

The key takeaway is that to successfully create a Twitter-like platform, engaging active users is essential for maintaining a dynamic environment. Currently, Bluesky appears to be attracting a segment of these active users, posing a challenge for Threads as it seeks to enhance its appeal.

While having more followers may correlate with increased reach, it’s not the only factor to consider. Users who actively engage with the platform are likely to gravitate toward an environment where they can cultivate their own audience and share content freely.

These users desire a platform where they can share links and discuss topics of interest without the fear of reach penalties. Bluesky provides this opportunity, and even though it currently has a smaller user base than Threads, the Threads team must recognize the value of real-time social interactions and adapt to meet the expectations of users seeking dynamic engagement.

Bluesky seems to have initiated a wake-up call in some respects, and now the focus shifts to whether Threads can reclaim its status as the “trending app of the moment” as it adapts to these emerging challenges.