David Bridges
Diddy wishes to dismiss some of the statements in a single of his sexual assault situations … saying he cannot be sued underneath suggestions that didn’t even exist at the time of the alleged incident.
According to new docs, acquired by TMZ … Diddy’s legal pros are firing back once again at claims manufactured by Joi Dickerson-Neal — a lady who submitted a go properly with from him in November boasting he drugged and sexually assaulted her back once again in 1991.
Joi submitted six causes of motion from Diddy … and, now his team’s declaring she can’t sue him for numerous of people today claims just due to the fact the regulations did not exist when she claims he assaulted her.
For illustration, Dickerson-Neal’s suing Diddy underneath the New York Specialist solutions for Victims of Human Trafficking Regulation … which Diddy’s legal pros take note was not in influence appropriate up till 2007 — about 16 numerous years just immediately after the incident took region.
Diddy’s also contesting her statements significantly less than the New York Situation Revenge Porn Law, codified in 2019, the New York Metropolis Victims of Gender-Enthusiastic Violence Security Legislation — handed in 2000 — and the 2016 NYC Revenge Porn Law.
In essence, Diddy’s attorneys are contacting for statements underneath these suggestions to be dismissed with prejudice — nonetheless, of class, they are also preserving their customer did not dedicate the alleged acts at all, like the sexual assault she promises to have endured at his arms.
TMZ.com
Worthy of noting … the legal pros typically are not producing the quite exact same argument versus the initial two counts — well-liked regulation promises for assault and battery and intentional infliction of psychological distress that seriously do not count on distinct statutes — just due to the fact the arguments about the timing of specified statutes becoming handed do not implement to these statements … which are at the coronary heart of her circumstance.
One particular added concern Diddy’s lawyers are escalating … they say Joi can’t sue Negative Boy Documents or Undesirable Boy Amusement like she’s hoping — ’cause these, considerably as well, did not exist nevertheless possibly.
Cameron Steel
Maya Kensington
